Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Housejoy (2nd nomination)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.

talk) 15:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Housejoy

Housejoy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So far, nothing to add on this Blatant misuse of Wikipedia. Only interest is to build an online reputation and Luring customers in the name of Wikipedia. Intro reads as The company is based out of Bangalore and operates in Mumbai, Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Gurgaon, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Pune and Chandigarh.' The coverage are only for the funding information, not for why a company is notable. Investment by Amazon, doesn't makes a vanity notable. Sundartripathi (talk) 04:05, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, this user has a history of adding external links, talk page is full of discussion of his multiple failed attempts to create Housejoy. Sundartripathi (talk) 04:10, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:45, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This is the 2nd nomination and the previous one closed as Keep so I was expecting to see enough sources to meet the criteria for establishing notability. Unfortunately, none of the sources listed meet the criteria - they fail
    -- HighKing++ 14:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
  • Keep per the previous AFD - This "Blatant misuse of Wikipedia" is infact a well sourced article that is backed up by
    WP:IDHT is not a valid reason. –Davey2010Talk 13:27, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply
    ]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947(c) (m) 20:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. this is a pure directory entry--because there is nothing else to report that wouldn't be considered promotion. When a subject reaches that point, there's no reason to have it in an encyclopedia , The entire concept of notability relies on their being encyclopedic information in the first place. The articles listed demonstrate this-they too are mostly directory information. Material only about finding doe not meet the GNG. And the only re I cna see that is more than that, Business Standard News, is a straight press release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DGG (talkcontribs) 08:30, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • there is nothing else to report that wouldn't be considered promotion – I have provided negative coverage of the company below. The sources say "There's serious trouble brewing up within the house of Bangalore startup Housejoy" and calls Homejoy a "home services mess" that has provided a poor customer experience.

    Cunard (talk) 05:39, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I have added negative coverage to the article. The nominator wrote:

    So far, nothing to add on this Blatant misuse of Wikipedia. Only interest is to build an online reputation and Luring customers in the name of Wikipedia.

    The negative coverage I added ensures that this will not be the case.

    Cunard (talk) 05:53, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.