Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hringsolal Thomte
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 21:51, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hringsolal Thomte
- Hringsolal Thomte (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Player who passes
]- Keep: passes WP:Football spent more time improving articles and less time trying to find reasons to delete them then Wikipedia would be a better place. A stub article is not inherently worse than no article at all - an average user may be inspired to add additional info to an article they come across but has much less likelihood to start one about something they have knowledge of. A two minute search found his stats for this season - a speaker of the regional language could probably find considerably more info. Bladeboy1889 (talk) 19:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- ]
- Delete - per nom. Given the poor quality of the article and the clear absence of sources, this falls under the portion of general notability, but given that general notability is clearly not met in this case, deletion seems a reasonable course of action. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:52, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL; there is plenty of precedent that making one pro appearance is not enough to keep an article that comprehensively fails GNG. GiantSnowman 11:43, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As noted, meeting WP:ROUTINE and don't help establish notability. Sideways713 (talk) 11:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - even though this subject passes talk) 16:59, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.