Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hristo Georgiev (serial killer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:33, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hristo Georgiev (serial killer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following a talk page discussion, we found nothing beyond the one source mentioned in the article. It therefore fails

WP:GNG's requirement for multiple sources. --- Possibly ☎ 18:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly ☎ 18:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly ☎ 18:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly ☎ 18:54, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I find it almost impossible to believe there's zero sources about this guy, leading to the conclusion it could be a hoax (which is also mentioned in the talkpage discussion). As a side note, the article's creator posted this thread on Reddit. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:42, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was the one who mentioned the possibility of a hoax - but now I'm leaning against that theory now. All the same, it's only got one reference (in 2 parts). The ref looks like a Bulgarian newspaper site in Bulgarian, and there's no way for me to determine if it's a RS. There's no matching article in the Bulgarian Wikipedia. I can't find any reason to keep it. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 20:12, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No coverage available for this guy hence doesn't qualify for GNG. JaredDaEconomist (talk) 11:25, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Absolutely zero reliable sources that demonstrate notability. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 02:10, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing on Google Scholar about them and most of the links to information on google search seem to come back to this wikipedia page to source it - which is problematic. Jamzze (talk) 17:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Aside from above well considered arguments, there is a chance that this article is part of a sophisticated attempt at character assassination. See this HackerNews discussion. Although Wikipedia obviously does not control Google's knowledge graph, if this article is indeed a hoax it may have been created to smear the subject of the aforementioned HackerNews discussion by combining Google's knowledge graph and Wikipedia to give the attack an air of legitimacy. Melmann

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.