Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyperchamber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete, per

Hyperchamber (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Fails

• Delete.
  WP:GARAGE could have been written about it. The only thing remotely approaching an assertion of notability is the phrase "The band wanted to perform in the John Horn Battle of the Bands 2007 but wasn't ready and says that they will try to perform in the 2008 Battle of the Bands". CSD G7 perhaps? Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 02:24, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• I dont know CSD criteria as well since I havent gotten into that but isnt G7 "Author requests deletion" I am not the author... perhaps I misunderstand the CSD guidelines though, but I do feel that it is important for me to make it clear that I am not the author so unless the actual editors whom have contributed to this article come forward that it does not fall under that criteria for speedy deletion. I found this article while doing a new pages patrol and tagged it for notability and decided to watch it. I am sad that the article hasn't improved because I tend to be more on the inclusionist side than deletionst. I apologize if my statement in any way suggested that I had personal attachment to this article, I am simply suffering from noobitus in my first nomination for AfD :( %%-SYKKO-%% (talk to me) 02:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• I think you mean
  WP:CSD#A7.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 03:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• CSD A7, right. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 03:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, A7 makes much better sense, I agree that it pretty much does fit that criteria.  %%-SYKKO-%% (talk to me) 06:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, article fails to establish notability as per
  WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 03:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I've tried a search in Google News archives, and also in a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but have not found any reliable sources to help to establish
  WP:N notability. Delete unless sources are found by the end of this deletion discussion. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:20, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Great band name, but sadly failing
  WP:CSD#A7 too. sparkl_!sm ^hey! 20:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.