Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I-Free
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 15:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
I-Free
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- I-Free (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A massive advertisement, tagged since 2016, with no reliable sources provided to support any claims. Made by two PR-editors. It currently doesn't meet
WP:CORP and can hardly be fixed otherwise than recreated from scratch. VanoTheOldest (talk) 15:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Russia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:17, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep meets WP:GNG. While the main company's business appears to have faded due to app stores dominating its market, and there is no clear indication of recent notable activity, there is a lot of coverage from the early 2000s. During that time, it was considered to be among the top three companies in the market. Some examples of non-trivial coverage:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. I am saying this because even though a user tried to reduce the amount of promotional content earlier in it, this article has so few talk) 23:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete ]
- Delete The article seems to lack independent, reliable sources that provide WP:NOTADVERTISING,
- Delete The article seems to lack independent, reliable sources that provide
- PD Slessor (talk) 00:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.