Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idin Samimi Mofakham

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Already speedy deleted by

WP:G12. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 02:22, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Idin Samimi Mofakham

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable composer failing short of

WP:BEFORE does not show evidence of true notability. Celestina007 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:45, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article already included quite some references and external links showing the notability of the topic (the internationally renowned arts centre deSingel, magazines like The New Yorker,...). Also internal Wikipedia links show the importance of this person. This person is for example quite central for the mentioned

WP:BEFORE was not carried out sufficiently before nominating the article for deletion, especially with regard to "C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted" and "D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability". To state the notability more clearly, I added some extra references and external links, such as the Discogs profile, an academic article and the press article in the international newspaper Tehran Times. I hope that this is sufficient evidence of notability. Beireke1 (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.