Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iikss
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:19, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Iikss
- Iikss (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is a lack of sources backing up claims set out in the article - it is entirely based on the group's own website. I also have problems with
]- Support deletion. We have no evidence so far that this group is notable when it comes to being discussed by reliable sources. Alephb (talk) 17:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 20:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Note: This debate has been included in the talk) 20:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Delete - no independent source documenting this organization.Glendoremus (talk) 00:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. In general, WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES is an invalid argument, and until such sources are found, I have agree that the topic lacks notability. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)]
- Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:43, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.