Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ingenuity Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:31, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ingenuity Project

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable project. Only relevant to a small number of schools in a small area. No significant coverage in secondary sources. noq (talk) 09:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 15:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 15:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:09, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete. There is coverage in secondary sources. The organization has a $1M yearly budget. All the coverage I could find was local to Baltimore [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] and this one [6] where it is described as a "little known non-profit" and a "best-kept secret". One mention in USA Today, but not that significant [7]. Not enough to pass GNG. MB 06:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.