Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iomart Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Iomart Group

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD, concern was: "not a directory, article written by paid contributor". I cannot confirm this was written by a paid contributor and there is some valid info there. May not be enough to constitute an article though. Jujutacular (talk) 02:23, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jujutacular (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Jujutacular (talk) 02:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - article meets
sentinel (contribs) 02:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the

sentinel (contribs) 02:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:40, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:56, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep although I can see that there are significant reasons to be concerned about the process by which this article was created. It appears to have been recreated several times.
WP:CORPDEPTH. Drchriswilliams (talk) 08:37, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Enough on searches to pass either
WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.