Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iowa State–West Virginia football rivalry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Iowa State–West Virginia football rivalry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. UW Dawgs (talk) 09:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 11:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 11:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 11:24, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~and possibly speedy as a hoax~~. Only 6 meetings, no reliable references, just a blogger who insists on commenting about previous riots in blog posts.
π, ν) 20:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

I've removed the hoax-y material, it's now just a non-notable stub.

π, ν) 21:00, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete. My searches do not reveal multiple sources dealing with this six-game football series as a true rivalry. It might conceivably evolve into a true rivalry if both teams remain in the Big 12, but it's just not there at this time. Frankly, there's cause for skepticism that this series will ever evolve into a true rivalry given that it lacks the intangible characteristics that typically generate a rivalry, including geographic proximity (Ames and Morgantown are 871 miles apart and separated by four other states) and history (the teams first met in 2012). Nor are there unusual circumstances to this series that would warrant a stand-alone article such as multiple games impacting the national title, matches where both teams were highly ranked, or games receiving ongoing coverage as being historically important. Cbl62 (talk) 16:14, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- This article, I believe, is
too soon at best. In a nutshell, I agree with most of Cbl62's comments. -- Dolotta (talk) 22:34, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - currently, not enough in-depth coverage to show this nascent match-up rises to the level of gng necessary to satisfy it as a rivalry. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:06, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.