Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isaac Mendez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Heroes (American TV series). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:38, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Isaac Mendez

Isaac Mendez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per maintenance tags: Minimally sourced fictography, featuring individual episode recaps. There is already a list page of "Heroes" characters. Could perhaps be redirected there if not deleted altogether. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Television. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 06:27, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There's really nothing here, and nothing online when I did a search. Its complete fancruft. No RS or sigcov to be found. I also think this applies to a number of the other Heroes character articles as well. --Kbabej (talk) 17:04, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:09, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect. The referenced short section about a lawsuit can be merged to the article about the show. The rest is pure if lenghty
  WP:FANCRUFT and can leave on as a history of the redirect. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:50, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Merge the sourced section on the lawsuit to the main Heroes (American TV series) per Piotr. As the article on this character is up for deletion as being non-notable, perhaps this spinout article, (Artwork of Isaac Mendez), should be bundled with the nomination? Rorshacma (talk) 15:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Well, that article is properly sourced, so there might be more debate there. Feel free to nominate it separately, but I don't think we can bundle it w/ this one. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 16:47, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  The spinoff seems to fail GNG, I started a dedicated AfD for it. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 16:17, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.