Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Israeled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Israeled

Israeled (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet notability requirements. It may yet in the future, if this turns out to be a consistent cultural phenomenon, but right now it doesn't look like much more than a week-long Twitter trend. Notably it was also created by a Non-Extended-Confirmed account on a contentious topic subject to active Arbitration Enforcement procedures.

See Talk:Israeled#Deletion of Page. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language, Internet, and Israel. AntiDionysius (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- The current state of the article is poor. The sourcing of the entry is inadequate at best, it is a stub, and has multiple tags. I didn't find anything from

talk) 15:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

• Delete: Doesn't appear to have been mentioned much in media, [1] is all I find. Oaktree b (talk) 15:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - little evidence that this is a thing. Even if it was, the page would need to be more than a dictionary definition. JMWt (talk) 15:37, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete by the look of it, it is a dictionary definition of an antisemitic slur based on an anti-historical false narrative without so much as a critical viewpoint included. JM (talk) 16:17, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't confuse Zionism and israel with Judaism, There also exist an article called 'Pallywood' on Wikipedia but that doesn't mean it's Islamophobic. I know the article lacks a lot of citations but rather than deleting the article keeping it would let people to add more context. Balaj Khan (talk) 00:30, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with this article is not the point of view it presents; rather, it is the fact that the article seems to be a dictionary definition of something which doesn't currently have

sustained or reliable coverage

.

pluck ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded; I disagree with the notion that the article is antisemitic, I just think it isn't a good article. AntiDionysius (talk) 00:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this doesn't look like much more than a twitter trend; I couldn't find any reliable or sustained coverage. Pluckyporo (talk) 20:33, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agree with the above. Coverage is nowhere near significant. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:52, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: a DICDEF for a topical neologism with zero mainstream coverage. If this is still a thing a year from now or gains coverage, I'd say add it to Wiktionary. Owen× ☎ 23:08, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Racist slurs need to be well sourced and established otherwise the racism is on us.
  WP:SNOW applies. gidonb (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete -- We need to stop dragging racism into every discussion that is critical of Israeli or Zionist policies. That has absolutely nothing to do with this article, which is a patent neologism with no secondary source usage. At best, this is DICDEF. Cheers, Last1in (talk)

Any verb that assigns a negative association to a nation's name would be a racist slur. Not just this one. As off yet, there is no official rule that all racism is problematic except against Israelis. If we include such slurs in WP, there better be good sources. gidonb (talk) 16:37, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.