Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JSL Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

JSL Singh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced advertisement, fails

• Delete: Reads like spam to me. Not entirely sure why this spam has survived for 6 years now. JavaHurricane 06:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:43, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Would be a
  BLP proposed deletion, but we are here. Unsourced. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  Robert McClenon, Twinkle help tooltip specifically said new unsourced BLPs, but i'll remember I can BLPPROD in the future, thank you. —moonythedwarf (Braden N.) 02:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, spammy and person is not notable -Xclusivzik (talk) 09:22, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable person and spammy, per Xclusivzik. COI also applies, as the article creator only edited this before he disappeared into thin air. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 10:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks reliable sources. I always thought BLPprod was limited to absolutely no sources, that means if you have atrociously non-reliable and primary sources, BLP prob does not work. I think at one point BLP prob essentially grandfathered old biographies of living people, but at some point we gave that up and opened it to any article on someone who is still alive. How it applies to unsouced articles on people who may be alive is a little trickier.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.