Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaci Stofferahn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss North Dakota USA. Redirecting as a valid search term Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jaci Stofferahn

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stofferahn has multiple points, but none of them pass notability guidelines, and none of the coverage of her does either. She was Miss Dakota USA, but as is becoming clear from the discussion at the RFC on creation of consensus standard that alone is not enough to be notable, and may lead to a proactive assumption of non-notable unless another point is brought up. That is to say, we may not be willing to keep any article on a state beauty pageant winner unless we have coverage in reliable secondary third party sources that cover them without regard to being a beauty pageant winner. Beyond this, Stofferahn is the child of a former member of the North Dakota State legislature. I created an article on her clearly passing inclusion guidelines father, but that has no bearing on her notability. She worked as an intern for a US senator. That is not enough to make one notable. She was a candidate for the state legislature. It is not clear from the article if she even won the primary, but it is clear she was not elected. Unelected candidates at this level are not notable. So in total, Stofferahn is not notable. John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:29, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- a
WP:ROUTINE or local. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:33, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:02, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Dakota-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss North Dakota USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect as per above.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 19:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.