Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Santino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Santino

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Orphaned article with only citations to primary sources. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Not clear how this person is notable. Only claim to notability is authoring several books and a position which is of unclear notability. Not seeing how this might meet

WP:PROF. RadioFan (talk) 22:37, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment The proposer of the deletion now agrees "that the article has been significantly improved to the point where it can meet at least

WP:PROF

-" See here:

User_talk:RadioFan/Archives/2010/July#Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion.2FJack_Santino. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 13:22, 19 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:03, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Comment~~ Keep. Folklorist with substantial coverage on GS with h index = 11. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Keep - Books subject to review in academic journals. Production of regional Emmy awards winning film Miles of Smiles, Years of Struggle. From 1996 to 2000 Santino was the editor of the Journal of American Folklore and was the President of the American Folklore Society so seams to me a clear pass of WP:Prof (Msrasnw (talk) 10:51, 17 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Withdrawn the article has been significantly improved to the point where it can meet at least
WP:PROF --RadioFan (talk) 15:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.