User talk:Msrasnw

Thanks for your message regarding the most recent page that I added. I made some small edits to Wikipedia before, but this is the first time I am included in an editors' discussion. Is the "talk" the only way Wikipedia editors or authors communicate? (Sorry about newbie question - will try to read more of the guidelines.) Vlado1 (talk) 14:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Msrasnw, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Samf4u, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created,

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Samf4u (talk) 18:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed you weren't notified about this as article creator. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 15:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear User:AleatoryPonderings, many thanks for letting me know ... seems a bit of an odd thing to send to AFD..... best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for your message regarding the most recent page that I added. I made some small edits to Wikipedia before, but this is the first time I am included in an editors' discussion. Is the "talk" the only way Wikipedia editors or authors communicate? (Sorry about newbie question - will try to read more of the guidelines.) Vlado1 (talk) 14:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on User's page. (Msrasnw (talk) 12:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Looking here in particular might help Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#Templates ... (Msrasnw (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Hah - you got there first, while I was formatting my refs and using {{subst:L}}! PamD 09:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- I was going to go for Archie Brennan (tapestry maker) but (weaver) is nicer. It is nice that there are still so many gaps on WP. Let us see how far it gets. :) (Msrasnw (talk) 09:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC))[reply]

... dear Msrasnw, you added a Needhangul template to the Talk:O-Gon Kwon page. There is an interwiki-Link to the Korean wikipedia included in the O-Gon Kwon page. What do you think about it, can we copy-paste the name from there? (I am a native speaker of german, i am not precisely informed about the uses and rules of en Wikipedia.) --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 18:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear Himbeerbläuling, thanks for letting me know. I will have a think ... but there is Hangul now in the info box so I am not sure if is really needed in the main text. There is probably some guidance somewhere that says it should... but I am not sure whether to do it. BEst wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2021 (UTC))[reply]
  • Thank you. And best wishes to you. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 17:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • Dear Himbeerbläuling had a go at it now. Not sure if it is OK but... Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 11:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Robinson (psychology), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Robinson (psychology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails

WP:LISTN

. A seemingly random list, missing many entries (even the very first one, from 1902, Christian IX). Abandoned since its inception in 2010, with hardly anyone interested in it (25 views in 90 days). Sourced to a general catalogue and the homepage of a stamp dealer for some reason.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:49, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Iceland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Arno_Tausch_(4th_nomination)

Springer, one of the world's leading publishers, now lists 70 items by this author, and rumours have it that they prepare a Festschrift with contributions by

Austrian political observer (talk) 05:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear Austrian political observer, I think a big part of the problem is the over-pomotional approach that has been taken tothe WP page on Arno Tausch, the defence of the page by some in the AFDs and the spreading cites to him throughout WP. I suspect this is due to a lack of appreciation of the problem of
  conflict of interest editing. For example if you yourself have any connections with Arno Tausch that it could be wise to refrain from editing WP in a way that could be seen to be promotional and one should make some mention of any COI that could arise. This is only my view of the WP approach. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 12:12, 8 July 2022 (UTC))[reply
  ]

Answer: I can only repeat: == https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arno_Tausch == This delition was carried out although a major cleanup of the article was finished before - all of a sudden during the debate - a user simply draftified the article, which is now in a good shape. All this is really frustrating: you re-write an article, and - here it disappears! The article now would have met all wikipedia standards, and there are dozens, and dozens of worse articles on social scientists all around the present Encyclopedia.

The author featured in the article, Arno Tausch, has now 70 entries at

On

Queen Victoria's funeral in 1901? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Navy State Funeral Gun Carriage. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Royal Navy State Funeral Gun Carriage), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page

.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

The article Norm entrepreneur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hoponpop69 (talk) 18:18, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Ross (blogger) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Ross (blogger) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dixon Lanier Merritt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

I notice you added extremely long decimal coordinates to the

• Sorry and [T]hanks for letting me know and jolly sorry. I will be more careful in future. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk)).... Again thanks User:Abductive I knew about the maps having heard the Argleton stuff on the radio but the other stuff, especially the sneaky use of morse code, is very interesting. (Msrasnw (talk) 11:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Thank you for uploading

; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:36, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Global Balkans for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Balkans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Balkans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Newhaven lad (talk) 19:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lyn Squire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyn Squire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyn Squire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]