Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Shook

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:55, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Shook

Jack Shook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably was a good guy but unfortunately I can’t seem to find any evidence of true notability as he as a person/sole individual does not seem to have in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources as such doesn’t scale

WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:36, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It's ok (and good!) to vote on articles that you've written. It's a nice article; thank you for writing it.
talk) 19:58, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
Good catch. Looks like that's an entry in their database, not a member listing.
talk) 20:00, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.