Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jayaram Ramineni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.

soft deletion is not available as it has already been PRODed and contested. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Jayaram Ramineni

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not demonstrate how this person meets Wikipedia:Notability (people), and the one source mentions him in half a sentence only. Doing a news search for the name in quotation marks draws a blank. Schwede 66 18:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment unsure - needs to be circulted to WikiProject's Fashion and Beauty Pageants as specific interest groups.

talk) 21:48, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks for tagging those two projects on the article's talk page. Within a day, they will thus get the AfD notification. Schwede 66 22:24, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the article creator has posted some comments on the talk page; amongst other things declaring a conflict of interest. Schwede 66 08:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches at Books, News, browsers and WP:INDAF immediately found nothing better. SwisterTwister talk 18:45, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.