Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean Dawson
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to
]Jean Dawson
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jean Dawson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California. Shellwood (talk) 15:25, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 15:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:57, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep Essence as quoted and this from MTv [1] seem to indicate notability for our purposes. Interview/mini feature in Variety [2] Oaktree b (talk) 01:25, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: gets regular coverage from major pubs (NME + DIY for a start). Article needs a lot of work but is absolutely salvageable. QuietHere (talk) 19:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to consider possibility of merger with Draft article.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC)- Keep: Meets ]
- Merge: draft has a serious lack of sources but the info's all been written out and I think at least a significant amount can be sourced so it's worth saving what's there, plus it's just more filled out than the article which needs way more prose. QuietHere (talk) 01:42, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.