Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Etito

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 13:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Etito

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable and promotional. The refs are interviews where she says whart she likes, as even the titles indicate. DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom and also think Celestina007 would enjoy the many works of this prolific Nigerian editor. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:48, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — No in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. @Alexandermcnabb, I find your ping to be mischievous, I however know you mean well and your ping a nudge for me to investigate possible undisclosed paid editing. I have done so in the past and without divulging much that is all I am permitted to say. I am however concerned that they possess Autopatrol and are creating a promotional article for a non notable entity. Their eligibility to hold Autopatrol is what is debatable, I’m afraid that’s all I am permitted to say. I’m restrained at the moment by higher authority not to divulge more than this. Celestina007 (talk) 14:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Aishaa14 (talk) 19:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.