Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Towns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 00:04, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Towns

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability. Has not made an active roster, not currently on an NFL roster Edday1051 (talk) 09:29, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as there's nothing to suggest keeping and improving. SwisterTwister talk 23:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Don't have time to fully evaluate at this time (will try to come back to it), but I am finding some significant coverage, e.g., (1) this and (2) this from The Birmingham News, (3) this from the Press-Register, (4) this (arguably routine) from The Washington Post, (5) this (arguably routine) from Comcast Sports Net Philly, and (6) this from The Samford Crimson (arguably not independent). Cbl62 (talk) 17:38, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor ^Talk! 08:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a
WP:GNG pass, per Cbl62's sources. Ejgreen77 (talk) 02:16, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Cbl62's sources. Jujutacular (talk) 05:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.