Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeromes Dream

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Article's subject is found to not be notable. Other article's presented shall be deleted under CSD A9, as proposed. Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:38, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeromes Dream

Jeromes Dream (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

WP:GNG. Article has no third party sources or media coverage. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 01:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl speak up! 07:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl speak up! 07:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl speak up! 07:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — kikichugirl speak up! 07:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a non-notable band with no significant coverage or third party sources to indicate notability. I am also nominating this article as the deletion of this article would mean an
WP:CSD A9 for the other article. Aerospeed (Talk) 03:32, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply
]
Seeing Means More Than Safety (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Presents (Jeromes Dream album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 06:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.