Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Furrer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect may be created (and discussed) as a normal editorial action, but there is not enough support here for that to be an option right now. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jessica Furrer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Furrer's only claim to even marginal notability is being Miss Arkansas USA. This is no where near enough to make her notable. There is only one source, a source from the pageants themselves. This article is so far below the level of notability I hardly see it worth even being discussed. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly
Talk to my owner:Online 04:54, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk • mail) 06:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk • mail) 06:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk • mail) 06:02, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk • mail) 06:07, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Redirect to Miss Arkansas USA as a valid search term, and the subject is mentioned there. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:52, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 21:02, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

talk) 00:26, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Delete -- I'm not finding any RS for this BLP. A redirect is unneeded, as it's unlikely that the subject has been noted enough for the name to have become a valid search term. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no sign of notability. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 00:05, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.