Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Francés Blanc

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:40, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Francés Blanc

Joan Francés Blanc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Not sure it is the place to discuss it, but let me try. Are Google and English language the only valid criteria here? There are also some references in Jstor, but it seems your check was not that deep (eg. in The Year's Work in Modern Language Studies Vol. 60 (1998). Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/25833085 p. 191). As I am used to bureaucratic arbitrariness, I will take it easy anyway. Best regards. --— J. F. B. (me´n parlar) 16:38, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is the right place as AfD is common in en.Wiki at least. But the work you cited just covers for one page, how long is it and is it significant coverage? VickKiang 22:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not here to judge what is significant or not. A quick search using wikimedia library and I found other articles in Jstor, but in Muse, too. I have added the references to the Occitan language version of Wikipedia. Best regards. --— J. F. B. (me´n parlar) 20:39, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is the responsibility of those wishing to keep the article to PROVE that
WP:SIGCOV is met, so that others participating in this discussion can judge whether they are significant or not. The page you've linked to does not appear to be about the subject. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:38, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - His work's been cited a few times by others, but nowhere near enough to meet
    WP:GNG as well. - Aoidh (talk) 15:13, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.