Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Iten Sutherland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Joan Iten Sutherland

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any reliable sources for this person; none of the current references in the article are reliable, and there are no news results when searching their name. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Buddhism. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 21:27, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced quotes and a CV, rest isn't clear as to what she does. I don't find any sources we can use. There are a few in Gbooks, but mostly brief mentions. Delete. Oaktree b (talk) 23:01, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Article fails
WP:ANYBIO. I won't get into the numerous issue with the prose as those are surmountable problems, (the article needs serious attention if kept) but the key issue here is the lack of notability. Outside of primary sources that the article's subject is associated with, there's no significant coverage that I could find with one exception. I did find things like this which are literally a single sentence trivial mention, but the only thing of substance I could find is this page (177) from what looks to be a reliable book. However, everything useful to be gleaned from those few sentences are all from her own description of her being ill; there's nothing original in that text that did not come from this article's subject herself, so I can't really consider that independent coverage in a strict sense. Regardless, that's literally the only source I could find that was both independent and more than a trivial mention (or that didn't just copy the text of the Joan Iten Sutherland article verbatim), and notability requires multiple independent reliable sources, not just one questionable source. - Aoidh (talk) 00:45, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete fails GNG Andre🚐 17:02, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.