Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John W. Childs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.

(non-admin closure) b uidhe 04:35, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

John W. Childs

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail

J.W. Childs Associates. Unless we can save this article by finding evidence of in-depth, independent, reliable coverage, which I failed, but I am happy to let others show me what I missed? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:43, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:50, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with
WP:POINTy AfD after a shot down PROD. The Banner talk 18:05, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep Nicknamed the "Republican ATM", the subject appears in several articles and listicles, despite being notoriously "media-shy": (1)(2)(3). A nice article on his conservation work through the Wild Salmon Center exists here: (4). While the more recent coverage is about
WP:ONEEVENT, it is substantial and in-depth, and provides a ton of further detail on the man's life, e.g. USA Today, Boston Globe, CNBC. I respect the BLP concern, but I think the entry can remain balanced. Given the above references, GNG is satisfied, and the subject appears notable beyond the recent charges in Florida. Pegnawl (talk) 18:23, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep by available sources and
WP:NEXIST. Yikes, this too was prodded! Please use the tool appropriately. gidonb (talk) 01:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep per above sources listed. Meets GNG. Mallardsfan19 (talk) 15:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.