Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Copp
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Jordan Copp
AfDs for this article:
- Jordan Copp (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Just about squeezes through
WP:GNG JohnTombs48 (talk) 08:25, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly Talk to my owner:Online 08:36, 11 October 2016 (UTC)]
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly Talk to my owner:Online 09:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 18:26, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:28, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - one substitute appearance in a minor cup game a number of years ago (to technically meet COMMONSENSE is needed here, and plenty of AFD precedent exists to say that barely passing NFOOTBALL is not enough when you fail GNG, see Oscar Otazu, Vyacheslav Seletskiy, Aleksandr Salimov, Andrei Semenchuk, Artyom Dubovsky, Cosmos Munegabe, Marios Antoniades, Scott Sinclair, Fredrik Hesselberg-Meyer, Matheus Eccard, Roland Szabó (2nd nomination), Metodija Stepanovski, Linas Klimavičius, Takumi Ogawa, Nicky Fish, Andrei Nițu, Daniel Oliveira Costa and Samuel Huber amongst others. GiantSnowman 18:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)]
- Delete - in total agreement with the argument made by GS Spiderone 21:21, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - Per GS, a fifteen minute substitute appearance six years ago for a technical NFOOTY pass is nowhere near enough to override GNG. Player is currently two tiers below the level required by NFOOTY and there is clear precedent for deletion in similar cases where there is no clear GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - player passes ]
- The line is drawn when it is obvious that the player fails GNG. NFOOTY is quite clear that players who have met the FPL criterion will "generally be considered notable", not that they are in all circumstances and the examples noted above are clear indication, if needed, that GNG trumps the subject-specific guideline. Fenix down (talk) 16:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- The majority of League One & Two footballers fail ]
- Not really sure what you're trying to say, you seem to be acknowledging this player fails GNG. If you think there are non-notable people with articles out there then you should feel free to nominate them. Fenix down (talk) 16:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Yes i agree but he is not really a league 2 player because he has never played in league 2! a sub appearance in a minor cup 5 years ago should not be enough for WP:COMMONSENSE. He played as a substitute one Football league trophy game 5 years ago for a league 2 team that at the time had almost been liquidated and had barely any senior players. He was released 4 years ago and has spent most of that time playing at level 7 and below, and he is now in his mid-twenties and playing well into the non league system. I don't see how he needs an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnTombs48 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 14 October 2016 (UTC)]
- Yes i agree but he is not really a league 2 player because he has never played in league 2! a sub appearance in a minor cup 5 years ago should not be enough for
- Not really sure what you're trying to say, you seem to be acknowledging this player fails GNG. If you think there are non-notable people with articles out there then you should feel free to nominate them. Fenix down (talk) 16:42, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- The majority of League One & Two footballers fail ]
- The line is drawn when it is obvious that the player fails GNG. NFOOTY is quite clear that players who have met the FPL criterion will "generally be considered notable", not that they are in all circumstances and the examples noted above are clear indication, if needed, that GNG trumps the subject-specific guideline. Fenix down (talk) 16:16, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - whilst there are a number of references listed none of them are dealing with the subject to a significant degree. Eldumpo (talk) 09:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable footballer. Without coverage no reason to have an article on a non-notable player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:44, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.