Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Hartney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 01:11, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Hartney

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems borderline, but I don't think he quite meets

for 7 years, hopefully we can now resolve it. Boleyn (talk) 15:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the

list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable athlete. Has competed in some events but has not medalled. Doesn't meet WP:Notability requirements. Suttungr (talk) 00:43, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 13:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks the coverage required to meet
WP:ATHLETE. Never appears to have competed at the highest level and winning a national age group title is not enough to show notability. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep - no sport specific guideline for swimming, but he has competed in the 2009 World Championships (see [1]) and competed (making the 'B' final) at the 2006 Pan Pacific Swimming Championships and 2010 Pan Pacific Swimming Championships (see [2] and [3]) that are equivalent to the European Championships. In addition, with little searching I was able to come across these [4], [5], [6], [7], and [8]. I think this shows GNG is met. Also, and this is just my opinion, when a sport does not have sport specific guidelines I try to look at a similarly situated sport. Track and Field can be considered similar in that it has meets, its major event is the Olympics, is timed race that are mostly individual and some relays, and receive a solid amount of sports coverage. Competing in worlds or a Continental-level meet is enough to presume GNG is met. With what I found with little effort and in view of the high level of competition, I say keep.RonSigPi (talk) 18:43, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:27, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Just over the border of borderline. Meets GNG, as ronsigpi points out. Epeefleche (talk) 08:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.