Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juan Paz (swimmer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Juan Paz (swimmer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination

)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not have sourcing that rises to the level of Sigcov. GNG requires multiple examples of Sigcov, but this article does not even have one source that meets that. It also does not meet Olympics notability, but even if it did that would not be enough to justify having the article. Searches for additional Sigcov turned up nothing. Juan Paz itself though is a very common name. So without having even one example of Sigcov, the idea that this swimmer is the most likely search option for this name, even just among swimmers, is entirely unsourced. John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:05, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Reply In the event of nothing being found for this individual, then redirect to
  WP:ATD. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 09:03, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Redirect to
  WP:GNG through lack of significant coverage. BilledMammal (talk) 02:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Delete. A disambiguated article is not a useful redirect. BilledMammal (talk) 04:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as suggested by User:Lugnuts. Beyond no sources that support notability, there is also very little information here. BOTH need to be solved for me to keep. gidonb (talk) 02:37, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.