Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julian Sepulveda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 06:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Sepulveda

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about former footballer which fails

WP:GNG. Aside from an interview at Cápsulas de Carreño, there is only routine and trivial coverage such as transfer announcements and statistical database entries. PROD was removed without offering any evidence that SPORTBASIC or GNG are met. Jogurney (talk) 05:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Colombia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:03, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - apart from the interview, I too can find little else. Sport24 is only a passing mention. If the article is somehow kept then it should be moved to Julián Caro, which seems to be their common name. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: this is correct, his name should be Julián Caro, with Caro being his main surname and Sepulveda being his secondary maternal surname - team sheets and tweets from Envigado FC show him as Julián Caro. No opinion on whether the article should be kept. Richard3120 (talk) 12:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 17:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.