Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Fields

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:31, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Fields

Justin Fields (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not satisfy the notability requirements for American football, fails

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 22:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete only finding fan-blog sites and discussion pages specific to Gerogia football. Hasn't generated enough press (that I can find) to pass
  WP:GNG. Would change my position if they were presented.--Paul McDonald (talk) 02:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep. As Fields has not yet played a down in college ball,
  WP:NHSPHSATH is arguably the governing standard, and the article is a stub that need work. But this guy is that rare player who clearly meets the NHSPHSATH bar. A search of NewsLibrary.com turns up hundreds of articles focused on him. He's been rated by ESPN.com as the No. 1 guy in the 2018 recruiting class. See ESPN profile. Here are a few examples of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources: (1) this and this from ESPN.com; (2) this from USA Today; (3) this, this and this from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution; (4) this story about a documentary film crew covering his senior year; (5) this from Sports Illustrated; (6) this from The Philadelphia Inquirer; and (7) this from CBS Sports. Cbl62 (talk) 03:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Yeah, stuff like that would have me switch to Keep.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.