Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Georgia (U.S. state)

Points of interest related to Georgia (U.S. state) on Wikipedia: Outline – History – Portal – Category – WikiProject – Alerts – Deletions – Cleanup – Stubs – Assessment – To-do

Points of interest related to Assessment – To-do

Deletion Sorting Project
(talk) Project page Lists (by ABC) Lists (by topic) Lists (computer-readable) AfD: Today, Yesterday Delsort scripts
v t e

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state). It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Georgia (U.S. state)|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Georgia (U.S. state). For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

This list is also part of the larger list of deletion debates related to

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

• WikiProject Deletion sorting/Georgia (U.S. state)/archive

Scan for Georgia (U.S. state) AfDs Scan for Georgia (U.S. state) Prods Scan for Georgia (U.S. state) template TfDs

Amir Bashti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The highest level the subject played in was for the reserve affiliate of

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, California, and Georgia (U.S. state). Raskuly (talk) 05:41, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:15, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. GiantSnowman 08:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Subject appears to have coverage in [[1]], [[2]], and [[3]]. I'd say this subject meets the
  WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 15:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

2025 Georgia Meteor Event (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, United States of America, and Georgia (U.S. state). XYZ1233212 (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Move to draft. All that the newspapers are saying right now is "this happened".
  WP:TOOSOON rtrb (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Draftify and rename. This was big news in multiple states. Let’s see if there’s any more coverage in the next 6 months. —A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 12:48, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Fair point, this might turn into something eventually. Revising my answer. rtrb (talk) 13:21, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The eventual name should probably be something like "2025 American meteor event" or "2025 Southeastern United States meteor event" since this was not exclusive to Georgia. Also there's the Georgia (country) vs. Georgia (U.S. state) issue to consider when naming. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 17:44, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Draftify: Saw this on my feed today. I believe an article at this time is
  WP:TOO SOON. Returning to draft will allow time for more potential coverage and information to come out. 11WB (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Lewis Kayton House (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's not even a NRHP. Once upon a time, a house that is more elaborate than common was built. It changed ownership a few times and have seen several uses, like most buildings. It's now a hotel.

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, History, and Georgia (U.S. state). Graywalls (talk) 20:46, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - the article seems to promote the developer; since it is a business, am wondering if it should be assessed per
  WP:NBUILDING Netherzone (talk) 01:40, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]

  This article as well as Richard C. Kessler has been blemished by public relations editing. Not surprisingly. Check edit history. I feel that notability is puffed up considerably in both cases. Graywalls (talk) 05:20, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Let's focus just on notability here for a second: there is a reasonable argument to keep. It's in architecture books [4] and Savannah Now article which talks about the building, but if you look closer, the vast, vast majority of sources are about the businesses/hotels occupying the building and not about the building itself. The article as written fails NCORP and it's not clear that it would pass if the article were about the hotel itself. In short, this is an article which I could see being salvaged, but at the moment it's an article on a building that's really being used to promote the hotel within the building. SportingFlyer T·C 19:16, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The subject of this article fails
  WP:NCORP criteria; and SportingFlyer's evaluation. It's possible PROMO for the developer/business. Additionally two of the existing sources in the article are Arcadia Press publications; there have been several discussions about the reliability of this series of books that are marketed to tourists in trinket shops and convenience stores, they are not serious architectural history analysis. Netherzone (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply
  ]