Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. C. John (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

K. C. John

K. C. John (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable and fails verifiability. Based on only one source that is a primary source. Clearly fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Initials are too common to be able to filter out the results. What's used now is one primary source, I don't see GNG as being met. Oaktree b (talk) 16:35, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Christianity, Kerala, and Washington. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:36, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Too vague and too old to come up with any verification. The only source is an external link to the subject's own television station. — Maile (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.