Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Wolstenholme

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Significant coverage has not been demonstrated. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 08:42, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Wolstenholme

Karen Wolstenholme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. 2 of the 3 sources are primary. Fails

WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 05:53, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete BLP, fails GNG and BIO. Source eval:
Comments Source
Who's Who 1. "Wolstenholme, Karen Suzanne, (born 16 Oct. 1962), HM Diplomatic Service, retired; Ambassador to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, 2011–12; FCO Services, 2013–16". Who's Who. 2011. doi:10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.253944.
Article is about "Barnaby Jones works as a junior diplomat at the British Embassy". Only content about subject is, "The British Ambassador to North Korea is Karen Wolstenholme." 2. ^ "British diplomat takes roller coaster ride with North Korea's leader Kim Jong-un". www.telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 9 May 2023.
Primary source - Foreign & Commonwealth Office 3. ^ Jump up to:a b "Change of Her Majesty's Ambassador to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea". Foreign & Commonwealth Office. 27 September 2010. Archived from the original on 8 March 2011.
Government annoucement about appointment, info is from government, not IS 4. ^ "Appointments: Ambassador to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Retrieved 9 May 2023.
Two sentences about a government annoucement regarding an appointment 5. ^ "Woman tapped as next British ambassador to N. Korea". The Korea Times. 29 September 2010. Retrieved 9 May 2023.
Government report about a government employee, not IS 6. ^ House of Lords (2012). The Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).: House of Lords official report. H.M. Stationery Office.
Government report about a government employee, not IS 7. ^ Parliamentary Debates (Hansard).: House of Commons official report. H.M. Stationery Office. 2010.
One of several individuals interviewed about life in North Korea; interview, not IS; brief, not SIGCOV. 8. ^ Lynch, Colum (22 November 2021). "The Life of Diplomats in North Korea". Foreign Policy. Retrieved 9 May 2023.
Primary source - Foreign & Commonwealth Office 9. ^ "Change of Her Majesty's Ambassador to the Democratic People's Republic of Korea". Foreign & Commonwealth Office. 25 June 2012. Archived from the original on 7 August 2012.
The two keep votes above did complete BEFOREs, but were unable to find any sources to present other than those already in the article.
Jack's comment here [1], specifically ...as well as an telegraph.co.uk article regarding her having been identified as personally riding a rollercoaster alongside the DPRK's Supreme Leader. is completely false.
This is a BLP and this incident at the theme park was a serious diplomatic scandal. There statement is completely false: The subject of the article was not the person photographed as the source clearly states.[2] Jack clearly didn't read the source before their keep spam and in the process attributed a diplomatic scandal to an innocent person.  // Timothy :: talk  20:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - on further reflection, I believe BLPs require a high degree of documentation than regular articles. Weakly referenced BLPs watched by few editors are especially vulnerable to malicious actors. This person's job as a diplomat makes this even more of a risk. If this were not a BLP, I'd stick with my earlier "weak keep"--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 20:24, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This a
    WP:THREE has always been best practice for proving an Afd. scope_creepTalk 10:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.