Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katara Hospitality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. (non-admin closure) Jax 0677 (talk) 18:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Katara Hospitality

Katara Hospitality (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed without addressing underlying GNG. Subject is a government department, and a small one at that. Notability of its subsidiaries (hotels) does not confer notability on the holding company Rhadow (talk) 22:00, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, as article's sourcing (based on many
  WP:RS demonstrates GNG. Schwede66 18:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - There is more than enough sourcing for this one. The article even references Reuters, a very high quality news source. RileyBugz^会話_投稿記録 18:51, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep sources such as references are ok and no prob Leodikap (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: References fail the criteria for establishing notability as they are either PRIMARY sources (or entirely based on PRIMARY sources such as PR or company announcements) or mentions-in-passing. Fails
  -- HighKing⁺⁺ 12:59, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Here are a few reliable sources I could find which discuss the subject: Forbes Middle East, Arabian Business, Arabian Business 2. I'm not sure if the Forbes Middle East article is a press release although it's written like one. Arabian Business is a reliable source and both articles have known authors. Elspamo4 (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

-- HighKing⁺⁺ 13:18, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

• Comment – See source search parameters below under the company's former name. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Comment I looked through the first few pages and I'm still not seeing any references that meet the criteria for notability under the company's former name.
  -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:23, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply
  ]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.