Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly Goldsmith (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly Goldsmith

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable reality television contestant; competed on, but did not win, Survivor. Academic credentials also appear to be non-notable. Bgsu98 (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Television, and California. Bgsu98 (talk) 03:42, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you walk us through how her academic credentials are non-notable? Dnllnd (talk) 12:45, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Back to add that based on

WP:PROF she meets 6 without much issue. She's frequently cited in the media, including coverage as recently as the past week.--Dnllnd (talk) 12:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:PROF#C6 requires that the subject be the head of a major university or major scholarly society. Our article says nothing resembling this. Maybe you mean #C7? —David Eppstein (talk) 16:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes, I did mean #C7. My apologies and thanks for the catch. Dnllnd (talk) 18:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only three references to media coverage are cited on the same topic. Can we bring up some more to ensure criterium 7 is met? JamesKH76 (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How many more are needed? There's only a caution against local media in the #C7 guidelines. The ones that are already there aren't local media - they're large, notable publications. The person who nominated the page for deletion never explained why there was a problem as we've already covered that she meets academic notability, based on WP:PROF, in addition to having been on TV. Dnllnd (talk) 14:25, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:21, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I haven't participated at AFD:PROF in a bit, but I think she should meet C5 as the holder of a named chair at Vanderbilt. Our article is out of date in this respect but it's described here. Larry Hockett (Talk) 15:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as she now meets NPROF #5 per Larry's comment.
Talkback) 16:11, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. The new information demonstrating a pass of
WP:PROF#C5 makes this clear. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.