Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Preston (journalist)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. A possible merge elsewhere can be discussed on the article's talk page. Randykitty (talk) 16:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Kenneth Preston (journalist)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I can't find any significant coverage, fails
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
The subject is very notable.
https://thehill.com/opinion/education/382560-exclusive-broward-countys-100-million-failure-on-school-safety?amp The Hill covered him.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/07/rubio-asks-feds-investigate-obama-school-discipline-rules-affected-parkland-shooting/ The Federalist. Senator Marco Rubio asked for an investigation over Preston's report.
https://www.weeklystandard.com/alice-b-lloyd/the-broward-blame-game?_amp=true Weekly Standard covering Preston.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/press-release-red-alert-politics-celebrates-30-under-30-award-winners Won a '30 under 30' award.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPef9pO44xA Appeared on the Daily Wire with Michael Knowles.
https://www.browardbeat.com/reports-broward-schools-sat-on-100-million-earmarked-for-school-safety/ Broward Beat
He also has 12,000 followers on his Twitter page, and his tweets gain significant attraction. There are other students from Parkland that are far less notable and have active pages, ex: Alfonso Calderon (activist)
Chrisrow (talk) 23:28, 26 March 2019 (UTC) Chrisrow
- ]
So can we close the discussion? Chrisrow (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2019 (UTC)Chrisrow
- The opinion article from The Hill is not appropriate to demonstrate notability. wumbolo ^^^ 21:59, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Besides that source, are the others suitable? Chrisrow (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Chrisrow
- The interview probably isn't, see ]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep:Passes WP:JOURNALIST --PATH SLOPU (TALK) 08:47, 3 April 2019 (UTC)]
- Comment: Links given above satisfies WP:GNG.--PATH SLOPU (TALK) 08:48, 3 April 2019 (UTC)]
- Merge to WP:BLP1E. If a new article is created specifically about this investigation, then this material can be merged there instead. — MarkH21 (talk) 04:58, 11 April 2019 (UTC)]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:40, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.