Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Hazlett
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
List of OL Reign players. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:07, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
]
Kim Hazlett
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Fails
]- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Washington. JTtheOG (talk) 04:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
DeleteRedirect toList of OL Reign Players and redirecting to that list, but absent such a page, this should be deleted. Carson Wentz (talk) 15:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)]- Page does exist, just capitalization messing it up. Seany91 (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. Changed my vote above. Carson Wentz (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Page does exist, just capitalization messing it up. Seany91 (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Redirecting a player who never played serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 19:40, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hazlett actually made one appearance for the Reign and her name appears on the above redirect target. So a redirect here is a very reasonable ATD. Carson Wentz (talk) 20:28, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of OL Reign players per WP:ATD; there is no significant coverage available to merit a standalone article. Jogurney (talk) 04:16, 3 March 2023 (UTC)]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 19:45, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of OL Reign players as some users have argued. That seems like the best option at the current time.Historyday01 (talk) 04:49, 8 March 2023 (UTC)]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.