Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinga Stanisławska

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kinga Stanisławska

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, querries on the internet have not provided sufficient information. Nadzik (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Businesspeople. Nadzik (talk) 15:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Poland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable investor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sourcing and content are insufficient to merit keeping this in the current
WP:TOOSOON. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - I was unable to discover any English-language sources that could be used to argue that the subject is notable. Please ping me if new suitable sources are identified. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:37, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.