Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kion Parchmont

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.

Kion Parchmont

Kion Parchmont (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Caribbean. HeinzMaster (talk) 22:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep User has nominated ~25 articles for deletion in ~20 minutes. Imposisble that a
  talk) 22:45, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Keep - Per @
  NemesisAT:. In addition, he is a young international player with an ongoing career. I look at the other sports WikiProjects and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 30. By the time I wrote this another 30 are probably deleted. Article may need improvement, but definitely not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:31, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:40, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - has clearly decided all players that play for national teams he does not feel confer notability are those which should be deleted. The usual revisionism and elitism around notability in sports Zanoni (talk) 08:24, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 15:09, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we base articles being kept or deleted on the merits of the article. Unless we want to limit article creation in any given project, there is no reason to try and limit article deletion. Articles are kept or deleted on their merits, at the present, not possible merits of the subject in the future. We lack indepth quality sources that provide significant coverage and are reliable, secondary and independent of the subject. So at this time we need to delete the article. This is without prejudice against recreation if at the future the subject does received GNG meeting coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - Surely this player has played for an international team, so should not be deleted. (https://www.national-football-teams.com/player/81906/Kion_Parchmont.html) Skippo10 (talk) 20:11, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 19:01, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete Lacks SIGCOV and seems to be an easy case of
  WP:GNG --Littehammy (talk) 00:26, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete; fails
  WP:LOCALCON as it aligns to a guideline that a broad community consensus was found against a few months ago. BilledMammal (talk) 14:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete - Article lacks evidence of SIGCOV as required by NSPORTS and GNG. –dlthewave ☎ 03:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

talk page or in a deletion review

). No further edits should be made to this page.