Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kramer Junction, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kramer Junction, California

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is nothing more than a road junction just outside of Kramer and is not treated as a community by sources. The coverage cited in the article mainly concerns construction in the area which simply uses Kramer Junction as a point of reference. –dlthewave ☎ 21:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Transportation, and California. –dlthewave ☎ 21:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge anything of use to California State Route 58, and then Delete the article. There's no reason to keep it as a redirect, but that highway construction information could be useful in State Route 58's history section. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Wikipedia:Merge and delete - if content is merged then it needs to remain a redirect to maintain the attribution history. Thryduulf (talk) 00:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then just Delete the inaccurate and policy-deficient geostub. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 02:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Andre🚐 03:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.