Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krishna Rani

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Clear consensus for the article to be retained. North America1000 11:11, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Krishna Rani

talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats
)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails

WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 03:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

She is the Captain of the Bangladesh women's national under-17 football team. --
talk) 06:37, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
so? Joeykai (talk) 07:40, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 07:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 07:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 07:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 07:58, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Joeykai: it would appear that the user has created several such articles; some players as young as 12! For example, see Nazma, Mahmuda Akter and Sheuli Azim. Worth investigating if someone can do so. Spiderone 08:11, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 08:13, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, Actually those girls brings revolution in Bangladeshi football, as the country is conservative and women are not used to play football. Those girls became champion AFC under 14 south zone for two times. They became group champion in qualification round for AFC under 17 cup and qualify for the main tournament for first time on the merit. For those reason, the girls get wide coverage in national newspaper frequently. Thus the article fulfills the
WP:GNG criterion. They get "Significant coverage" in TV and print media, "Reliable" as many of them are national, well-established newspaper, "Sources" as secondary sources, "Independent of the subject". You can find about 95 news results in google search for Krishna Rani in English and about 170 for Bengali search and also about 39 results in country's leading English newspaper The Daily Star (Bangladesh)
.
WP:GNG." Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 09:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
The team, as a whole, is notable. The sources provided in the article are more to do with the team rather than Rani as an individual. I don't see how Rani herself meets GNG. Spiderone 10:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - lack of, or complete absence of, coverage from independent, reliable sources on this woman as an individual rather than just part of a successful team, which does warrant an article. Spiderone 10:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Passes NFOOTY because of new evidence so now keep Spiderone 16:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Krishna's success turning the tide lengthy, dedicated article from national newspaper
  2. Under-16 women's team rewarded - further article from same newspaper with significant quotes from player and family
  3. Our very own Queen - Dedicate lengthy article / interview from Dhaka Tribune
  4. Captain Krishna - further lengthy article on player from Bengali media
These are just from the first page of a google search. Additionally there are loads of match reports which can help flesh out this article. To be honest, I'm not sure how these were missed by either @
WP:BEFORE. Fenix down (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply
]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's ). No further edits should be made to this page.