Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGBT rights opposition in companies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that this topic might be the subject of a proper article, but this is a

WP:TNT situation. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

LGBT rights opposition in companies

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is probably an article to be written about this topic, but this is woefully unsuited to mainspace. It is undersourced, full of editorializing (This article presents the recent history of companies that promoted anti-LGBT views in either a direct or indirect way in the United States of America.) and more a persuasive essay than an article. While AfD isn't clean up, the creator is move warring and won't wait for AfC, so we're here. Star Mississippi 02:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Politics, and United States of America. Star Mississippi 02:59, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this edit makes me think it's part of a school assignment, which explains the tone issues. But the underlying concerns remain. Star Mississippi 03:01, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify: I agree that there's probably room for an article here, but this article's in a sorry state right now. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)^{Talk to Me!} 04:33, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Draftify - This article was not ready for article space when it was moved to draft space by Ovinus, and it is still not ready for article space, and is not likely to be ready for article space. This
the second pillar of Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:42, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:41, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poorly sourced campaign essay full of
WP:TNT case and possibly worse. SpinningSpark 13:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply
]
Should consensus emerge to delete, we probably need SALT or a p-block of the creator to enforce it. Star Mississippi 03:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't see the potential for an article here. The general article is LGBT rights opposition, but I don't see any content here to merge there.--Trystan (talk) 15:05, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources needed but worth to keep. ScottWillis45 (talk) 15:14, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ScottWillis45: can you clarify that. Are you maintaining that the article is fine as it is and just needs proper sourcing? SpinningSpark 14:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.