Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Mode Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

La Mode Magazine

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another covert upe

WP:ADMASQ created by the same editor on a non notable magazine. This particular UPE article is very much interesting because it serves as a bedrock/foundation for other UPE articles created by the same user. The magazine lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. A before search links me to literally only user generated sources, self published sources, in general just primary sources. Celestina007 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Regardless of UPE/ADMASQ issues, the sources cited do not satisfy
WP:SIRS. Ref 1 only mentions the magazine in passing. Ref 2 and ref 3 are just announcements of upcoming events, without direct and independent coverage of the magazine. Ref 4 is a photo collection without any form of direct and independent coverage. Ref 5 only mentions the magazine in a citation by its founder—neither direct, nor independent, nor coverage. Ref 6 is an PR announcement with no direct independent coverage. And ref 7 announces an award winner, without covering the magazine itself directly and independently. JBchrch talk 14:45, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete Not notable, cruft. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:36, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Aishaa14 (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.
LSGH (talk) (contributions) 02:16, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: No indepth sources available. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.