Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence F. Jindra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrence F. Jindra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, while a competent professional still does not meet the GNG for article notability. References like [[1]] are advertising and attempting to sell or promote tickets. [[2]] is a one line ention and it's not about the Dr. The newsday as far as I can tell is the best source available. It's not trivial and does some in depth discussion

talk) 13:32, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, competence is not notability. Publication record turns up only one reasonably well-cited article, with an overall h-index of 4. The Newsday piece just looks like generic local-human-interest stuff. Opabinia regalis (talk) 19:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails
wp:prof as an academic physician, the most logical claim to fame. BakerStMD T|C 19:17, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.