User talk:Bakerstmd
| This is Bakerstmd's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1 |
Medical Translation Newsletter Aug./Sept. 2014
Medical Translation Newsletter
Issue 2, Aug./Sept. 2014
by
Feature – Ebola articles
During August we have translated
- Just some of our over 60 translations:
- New roles and guides!
At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our
- New sign up page!
We're proud to announce a new sign up page at
- Style guides for translations
Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to
- Some more stats
- In July, 18 full article translations went live (WP:RTTS)!
- We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! (Find them here old sign up page)
- We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap
- New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!
- Further reading
- Translators Without Borders
- Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign
--
]WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter
- Next
- Released: 1 November, 2014
- Editor: Tom (LT)
Hello
- What's new
- Several new GAs: Sebaceous glands, Pudendal nerve
- New FL (Anatomical terms of motion)
- Finally, an automatically-generated list of articles needing cleanup is available: [1]
- A list of recent changes is created, and can also be attached as a template for user pages:
{{Recent changes in Anatomy}} - Reached GA goal of 10 articles! -- now increased to 20
- We were Featured in the signpost!
- An essay about the use of WP:ANATSIMPLIFYis released (see below for more!)
- We fly past 10,000 articles (now already up to 10,150). Why is this important? Articles under our scope are automatically included in popular pages, the cleanup list, and will be included as the recent changes list is updated.
- A discussion about the formatting of infoboxes.
- A lot of editing on the heart article -- can it make it to GA?
- The medical newsletter, WP:PULSEfinds its feet, and Anatomy and Physiology are featured as a subsection!
- A new WP:ANAN) is created to focus on animal anatomy.
- How can I contribute?
- Welcome new editors! We have a constant stream of new editors who are often eager to work on certain articles.
- We are always looking to collaborate! If you're looking for editors to collaborate with, let us know on our talk page!
- Continue to add high-class reliable sources
- Browse images on WikiCommons to improve the quality of images we use on many articles.
- Quarterly focus - Anatomical terminology
Anatomical terminology is an essential component to all our articles. It is necessary to describe structures accurately and without ambiguity. It can also be extremely confusing and, let's face it, it's likely you too were confused too before you knew what was going on ("It's all Greek to me!" you may have said, fairly accurately).
In the opinion of this editor, it's very important that we try hard to describe anatomy in a way that is both technically accurate and accessible. The majority of our readers are lay readers and will not be fluent in terminology. Anatomy is a thoroughly interesting discipline, but it shouldn't be 'locked away' only to those who are fluent in the lingo – exploring anatomy should not be limited by education, technical-level English fluency, or unfamiliarity with its jargon. Anatomical terminology is one barrier to anatomical literacy.
Here are four ways that we can help improve the readability of our anatomical articles.
- Substitute. Use words readers are familiar with -- there is no need to use anatomical terminology unless necessary!
- Innervated by
- The nerve that supplies X is...
- Explain. When using terminology, remember readers will likely not understand what you mean, so consider adding an explanation and providing context. Use wikilinks for terms that a reader may not know.
- "The triceps extends the arm" may not be readily understood. A small addition may help the reader:
- "The triceps extends the arm, straightening it". Consider:
- Separate. Do not use long, complicated sentences. Don't write discursive, long comparisons unless needed. Start with simple information first, then get progressively more complex. Separate information by paragraph and subsection. Bite-sized information is much more easier to digest for readers who don't have a solid anatomical foundation
- Eliminate. Not all information is necessary on every article. Hatnotesare a simple and effective way to direct readers to another article. Don't provide long lists of synonyms of names for structures that an article isn't about. If a sentence has been paraphrased to the hilt, consider that several editors are indicating it may need to be simplified.
- "The other branches of the opthalmic nerve (nervus opthalmicus) and mandibular nerve(nervus mandibularis)"
- "The other branches of the opthalmic nerve and mandibular nerve" is much more easily digestible
- "The other branches of the
This essay is provided in full on
This has been
Some stroopwafels for you!
|
For great edits to peripheral artery disease. Lovely stuff! JFW | T@lk 17:27, 13 January 2015 (UTC) |
Thanks
Thanks for that :) 86.181.67.166 (talk) 17:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
Back you roll!
Hi Bakerstmd. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see
WP:MEDHOW
This can help you with refs. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for joining us. You are doing good work :-) Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC) |
Picture
Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLP_concerns_at_Stevens.E2.80.93Johnson_syndrome -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
RE: Mania
I only meant to reduce the impression that those experiencing mania are prone exclusively to dangerous behavior. If you feel this is irrelevant, by all means, remove it. In addition, please excuse my poor Wikipedia etiquette. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.164.144 (talk) 02:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. — MusikAnimal talk 22:45, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Abortion Page Edit
Thank you for taking the time to message me. I must say, getting used to all the nested rules and procedures means a newbie like me pretty quickly doesn't want to try. Everything I create is flagged and/or stripped, or whatever. The documentation is overwhelming and the process daunting. I am beginning to wonder why anyone bothers to try. Your feedback is appreciated and any help you could offer would be great.
Thanks Bushost (talk) 09:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
New Information
New information has surfaced at the Lazar Mathew AfD that may be worth a second look. Agricola44 (talk) 21:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC).
Embolism
A late thanks for the pointer - it did need adding. --Iztwoz (talk) 14:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vascular surgery, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iliac artery and Tibial arteries. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Heart
A very late response to peer review suggestion. I am other occupied these days with little room for much focus. I still feel there is a lot of editing needed as I commented on talk page....subsections were to be combined but nothing happened. But thanks, I shall mention this on the page. --Iztwoz (talk) 08:08, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Please Edit previous contribution
Hi Bakerstmd,
I was reading http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fibular_artery The fibular artery is labeled as the medial artery while the fibula runs laterally. Conversely the tibial artery is labeled laterally while the tibia is found medially.
Please use a corrected image if you could.
Thank you for the informative page otherwise. :)
70.66.237.49 (talk) 21:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Anatomy Newsletter #4
- Previous
- Released: 1 July, 2015
- Editor: Tom (LT)
Hello
- What's new
- A related WikiProject is formed, WikiProject Women's health
- Cerebellum, promoted in 2006, receives a long overdue featured article review
- Heart and Glomerulus receive a peer review
- Our article base explodes from about 10,000 to 12,775, with most new articles being redirects.
- Sympathetic nervous system, Autonomic nervous system and Parasympathetic nervous system all receive significant makeover, and cry out for more attention!
- Should Vermiform appendix be retitled to its more common name (Appendix)? The discussion continues!
- A large number of "back end" changes are made, and integration with Wikidata continues -- see the focus for more.
- Our set of cranial nerve-related articles receive a review by a subject expert
- How can I contribute?
- If you're interested in a topic area, let other editors know by creating a 'drive' in that area
- Continue to reword articles in language lay readers can understand
- Search Wikimedia commonsfor high-quality coloured images that can be used to replace some of our older, lower quality images.
- Don't forget that anatomy isn't always about gross anatomy! A number of other fields, including articles about embryology and histology ("microanatomy") cry out for attention.
- Issue focus - technical changes
This issue was originally going to focus on how far we've come as a project. However, that encouraging news can wait until next issue, as there are simply too many changes going on at the "back end" of our project not to write about. What do I mean by "back end"? I mean changes that are not necessarily visible to readers, but may have a significant impact on the way we edit or on future edits.
Templates
A number of visible changes have been made to our templates. Firstly, the way our templates have been linked together has changed. Previously, this was a small bar with single-letter links. This has been replaced by a light-coloured box contained within all our templates with fully-worded links, which provides links to relevant anatomy and medical templates. This should make life a lot easier, particularly for students and other readers who are struggling with the vastness of anatomical systems and their related diseases and treatments.
As part of this, almost all our templates have been reviewed and cleaned up. The previously confusing colour scheme has been removed and colour standardised. The titles have been simplified. References to "identifiers" in the titles of navigation boxes (such as
Anatomy infobox
Most of our articles have an infobox. Previously, there were 11 separate infoboxes for different fields, such as muscles, nerves and embryology. These have been united so that at the "back end", every template will take formatting directly from the main anatomy infobox -- however at the "front end", there is little difference for readers. This will make future changes much easier -- including adding new fields, formatting, and reordering the contents. Several changes have already been made: infoboxes now link to a relevant anatomical terminology article; contents are now divided into 'Identifiers' and 'Details' headings, making it easier to grasp content for new readers; and new fields have been added, including Greek and UBERON, with several more under discussion.
External links
An editor has reviewed all our template-based external links. These are the links that often fill the "External links" category, and sometimes used as citations. At least thirty different links sets, with the number of links stretching into the thousands, have been fixed, and if not functioning, deleted. A number of non-functioning dead links (with no archived websites available), and one or two others, have been deleted. This helps keep our 'external links' section relevant and functioning for those readers who want extra information about articles.
Wikidata
Perhaps our most important change has been integration with
Our next issue will focus on how far WikiProject Anatomy has come in the past 2 years.
This has been
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biliary injury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trauma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trauma center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Critical care. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Peer review
Hi, I saw your name on the list of volunteers at peer review, and wondered if you'd mind having a look at Sexuality after spinal cord injury, which I submitted at Wikipedia:Peer review/Sexuality after spinal cord injury/archive1. I'd like to eventually submit it for FAC, so if you have the time to let me know what you think it needs, I'd appreciate it! Thanks, delldot ∇. 07:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Peer review request
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/Manuel_Casanova/archive1
Thank you
Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!
- please help translate this message into the local language
|
The Cure Award |
| In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further. |
Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate
Hi
Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.
We welcome you to have a look the journal. Feel free to participate.
You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:
- Publish an article to the journal.
- Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
- Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
- Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
- Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
- Apply to become the treasurer of the journal
- Join the editorial board.
- Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
- Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
- Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Technical work like template designing for the journal.
- Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updates
wijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org. - Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.
The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reach
wikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.
WikiProject Anatomy newsletter #5
- Previous - Next
- Released: November 2016
- Editor: Tom (LT)
Hello
I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note
- What's new
- good article status
- Our previous barnstar has changed to the new shiny "Golden galen" barnstar to celebrate contributions to anatomical articles
- We are featured in the journal Clinical Anatomy [2]
- How can I contribute?
- Participate in discussions - a number of discussions such as those on our talk page or about our infoboxwould benefit from your opinion!
- Continue to add content to our articles
- Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
- Focus - how far we've come
How far have we come since
- Hundreds to thousands of articles improved and standardised by many, many editors.
- 14 new good articles created or added to our project [3]
- Improved quality of our articles - subjectively and objectively. GAs quadrupled from 5 to 16, B-class articles doubles from 62 to 115, C-class article well on the way to trebling from 219 to 611, Start-class increased from 1,082 to 1,570.
- Tens to hundreds of mergers performed between tiny, unedited articles - a remnant of our Gray's Anatomy (1918) heritage.
- Layout guidelineschanged and layout standardised for the majority of our articles
- In the project space:
- WikiProject Animal Anatomycreated
- 20-30+ new members
- 200+ new editors welcomed with our new welcome template
- Interdisciplinary category system to help new editors
- Active integration with wikidata in our infoboxes
- Overhaul of all of our navboxes
- Review and integration of all of our templates
- External link templates reviewed to ensure they all work
- To help improve anatomical literacy:
- Creation of a suite of five Anatomical terminology articles, and overhaul of existing articles
- Creation of the {{Anatomy-terms}} template created
- Links provided in infoboxes
- Simplifying anatomical terminologyessay released
These are substantial improvements and my thanks go out to our many editors who played a part in this. These improvements are almost always the result of consensus, compromise, collaboration and discussion between multiple editors.
I hope we can continue to improve in the future. How can you help? Continue to edit, add content, and create a welcoming atmosphere so that new editors will join us.
Well done to us all, and the many anonymous editors who've helped along the way!
This has been
Message delivered on behalf of
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Bakerstmd. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Gangrene
Was already listed under "tissue death" Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:28, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Bakerstmd. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
An edit you made to the Hemodialysis article
Hello, I just noticed that in this edit of yours to the Hemodialysis article, you added the markup "[1]" to the end of the paragraph, indicating that there was meant to be a footnote there. Do you remember which reference you intended to add in that location, if any? Graham87 03:52, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Anatomy newsletter (#6)
Released January 2018 · Previous newsletter · Next
Hello
I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.
Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:48, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
What's new
 |
new good articles since last newsletter include Thyroid, Hypoglossal nerve, Axillary arch, Human brain, Cerebrospinal fluid, Accessory nerve, Gallbladder, and Interventricular foramina (neuroanatomy)
|
 |
I write an Introduction to Anatomy on Wikipedia in the Journal of Anatomy [4] |
 |
Vagina receives a lot of attention on its way to good article status. |
 |
We reach two projects goals of 20 good articles, and less than half of our articles as stubs, in July 2017. [5] |
 |
A discussion about two preferred section titles takes place here .
|
Introduction to WikiProject Anatomy and Anatomy on Wikipedia
Seeing as we have so many new members, and a constant stream of new editors to our articles, I would like to write in this issue about how our project and articles are arranged.
The main page for WikiProject Anatomy is
- Project and article structure
Wikipedia has about
Our articles are structured according to the
Our articles are organised in a particular way. Most articles have a
}}. This lets us link to relevant and related articles. The bottom of articles also shows categories, which store groups of related articles.- Tools
For interested editors, our project offers a number of additional tools to help edit our articles. On our
Our project has all sorts of smaller items that editors may or may not know about, including a barnstar, user box ({{User WPAnatomy}}), welcoming template ({{WPANATOMY welcome}}) and fairly comprehensive listing of templates (here).
- Invitation
We are always happy to help out, and I invite new editors, or for those with any questions relating to how to get around the confusing environment that is Wikipedia, to post on
How can I contribute?
- Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask!
- Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
- Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
- Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there
This has been
Help with article review
Hi,
I noticed you were a member of the Cardiology task force. I am an experienced Wikipedia editor and have written a new article about a biomedical engineering firm called Alivecor. Draft:BC1278/sandbox/Alivecor They make the first FDA and EU approved medical device for the Apple watch, combining an ECG and artificial intelligence to spot early signs of atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm abnormalities. The Mayo Clinic is a major investor in the company.
Even though I'm an experienced Wikipedia editor, as a paid consultant to Alivecor, under Wikipedia Conflict of Interest policies
I wonder if you might have time to review the article? I'm available to make revisions, as requested. Then when it's ready to publish, you'd move it from Draft:BC1278/sandbox/Alivecor to Article: Alivecor
Thanks,
Ed BC1278 (talk) 18:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)BC1278
Peer review newsletter #1
Introduction
Hello to all! I do not intend to write a regular peer review newsletter but there does occasionally come a time when those interested in contributing to peer review should be contacted, and now is one. I've mailed this out to everyone on the peer review volunteers list, and some editors that have contributed to past discussions. Apologies if I've left you off or contacted you and you didn't want it. Next time there is a newsletter / mass message it will be opt in (here), I'll talk about this below - but first:
- THANK YOU! I want to thank you for your contributions and for volunteering on the list to help out at peer review. Thank you!
- Peer review is useful! It's good to have an active peer review process. This is often the way that we help new or developing editors understand our ways, and improve the quality of their editing - so it fills an important and necessary gap between the teahouse (kindly introduction to our Wikiways) and GA and FA reviews (specific standards uphelp according to a set of quality criteria). And we should try and improve this process where possible (automate, simplify) so it can be used and maintained easily.
Updates
.jpg)
,_160906,_ako.jpg)
Update #1: the peer review volunteers list is changing
The list is here in case you've forgotten:
{{PRV|JohnSmith|History of engineering|contact=monthly}}- if placed in the "History" section, JohnSmith will receive an automatic update every month about unanswered peer reviews relating to history.{{PRV|JaneSmith|Mesopotamian geography, Norwegian fjords|contact=annually}}- if placed in the "Geography" section, JaneSmith will receive an automatic update every yearly about unanswered peer reviews in the geography area.
We can at this stage only use the broad peer review section titles to guide what reviews you'd like, but that's better than nothing! You can also set an interest in multiple separate subject areas that will be updated at different times.
Update #2: a (lean) WikiProject Peer review
I don't think we need a WikiProject with a giant bureaucracy nor all sorts of whiz-bang features. However over the last few years I've found there are times when it would have been useful to have a list of editors that would like to contribute to discussions about the peer review process (e.g. instructions, layout, automation, simplification etc.). Also, it can get kind of lonely on the talk page as I am (correct me if I'm wrong) the only regular contributor, with most editors moving on after 6 - 12 months.
So, I've decided to create "WikiProject Peer review". If you'd like to contribute to the WikiProject, or make yourself available for future newsletters or contact, please add yourself to the list of members.
Update #3: advertising
We plan to do some advertising of peer review, to let editors know about it and how to volunteer to help, at a couple of different venues (Signpost, Village pump, Teahouse etc.) - but have been waiting until we get this bot + WikiProject set up so we have a way to help interested editors make more enduring contributions. So consider yourself forewarned!
And... that's it!
I wish you all well on your Wikivoyages, Tom (LT) (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Bakerstmd. Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Membership renewal
You have been a member of
| ReJoin Wiki Project Med Foundation |
|---|
Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Ways to improve Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome
Hello, Bakerstmd,
Thank you for creating Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome.
An infobox and categories would be nice additions to the page.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 19:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
Wikiproject Anatomy newsletter #7
Released September 2020 · Previous newsletter
Hello
I value feedback, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talk page, or remove your name from the mailing list.
Yours truly, --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
What's new
|
new also awaiting review |
|
A made-up eponymous term is used in our article that eventually makes it in to university anatomy teaching slides and a journal article |
|
We reach a project goal of 150 B-class articles in July 2020, increasing by about 50% over five years, and are one good article away from our goal of 40 GAs, doubling over the last five years |
|
In the infoboxes, and there is ongoing discussion about updating TE as well
|
 |
A beautiful new barnstar is released ({{subst:The Anatomist Barnstar}}) |
 |
portals are deleted (vale Human body and Cranial nerve portals)
|
 |
Some things left out from past newsletters - A large amount of redirects are created to help link plural structures, and Cerebellum ([9]) and Hippocampus ([10]) are published in Wikiversity. |
Newsletter topic: anatomy and featured articles
I have been asked to write up something introducing the
A vital purpose of Featured articles is to serve as examples for new and aspiring Wikipedia editors. FAs are often uniquely comprehensive for the Internet. They showcase some of our best articles, and can enhance Wikipedia's reputation if they are maintained to
Looking more specifically at WP Anatomy's featured content, the Featured media is impressive and seems to be an Anatomy Project strength. The
Whether tuning up an older FA at
You can read the essay "Achieving excellence through featured content" here.
SandyGeorgia has been a regular FA reviewer at FAC and FAR since 2006, and has participated in thousands of nominations
How can I contribute?
- Ask questions! Talk with other editors, collaborate - and if you need help, ask at our project page!
- Continue to add content (and citations) to our articles
- Collaborate and discuss with other editors - many hands make light work!
- Find a space, task or type of article that you enjoy editing - there are lots of untended niches out there
This has been
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Membership renewal of Wiki Project Med Foundation
Membership renewal
You have been a member of
| ReJoin Wiki Project Med Foundation |
|---|
Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01
Disambiguation link notification for May 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 12
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First rib resection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cervical.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the
The
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
Inactive peer review volunteer
Hi Bakerstmd, you're receiving this message because you were previously listed at
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the volunteers list, so that the list is kept up to date and editors who do need help can better find active editors. If you become active again and would like to add yourself to the volunteers list again, you can do so at any time by visiting
Thank you for volunteering to be on the list previously, and all the best on your WikiVoyages! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)