Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lifegate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -

Lifegate

Article is about a local community church with no indication of notability outside of the local area. Lots of Lifegate churches out there, but this one doesn't appear to be terribly notable. PROD and PROD2 removed, bringing here for debate. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) 05:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom; barring any claim to notability (historic significance of building, first church in country, etc.), this seems to fall into the domain of "just another church," as seen many times before here on AfD. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:30, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - not notable ww2censor 05:32, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. MER-C 06:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, just another church. --
  T | C) 09:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete as a non-notable individual Church location. Erechtheus 09:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 18:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. we keep non-notable schools but not non-notable churches? --NuclearZer0 15:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unsourced, so notability isn't established even to the nearly non-existent degree it is claimed.
  GRBerry 03:19, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Delete nn with no assertion of notability, Tewfik^Talk 03:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.