Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil Snupe
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Meek_Mill#Dream_Chasers_Records. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Lil Snupe
- Lil Snupe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A 18 year old aspiring rapper who was signed to a not notable independent label. The only coverage he received in reliable sources was in his untimely death. If he had not died there is no knowing if he would have ever became notable. See
message me! 20:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The best coverage prior/unrelated to his death appear to be these pieces from April which discuss his getting signed to Meek Mill's label. Gong show 14:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- And that is basicly it, then the wide coverage of his death. But is it really going to be notable for years (message me! 16:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- And that is basicly it, then the wide coverage of his death. But is it really going to be notable for years (
- Relistedto generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, talk) 02:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Talk 14:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, I would be in more support of a redirect rather than deletion. I just knew if I redirected it someone would challenge it. message me! 05:16, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed, I would be in more support of a redirect rather than deletion. I just knew if I redirected it someone would challenge it.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.