Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Polish football transfers summer 2018

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.

Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:45, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

List of Polish football transfers summer 2018

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Yet another fail LISTCRUFT/FANCRUFT/SYNTH/OR/NOTDIRECTORY/GNG Quek157 (talk) 20:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 21:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. LISTCRUFT and pretty useless article in general. Ajf773 (talk) 23:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. Giant Snowman 07:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is the main reason of the nomination for deletion? I'm preparing this article like previous ones (eg. List of Polish football transfers summer 2017 and List of Polish football transfers winter 2016–17). Ryba842 (talk) 18:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or merge These articles are typically notable and would usually be placed as part of the league article. No problem merging it back into the league article, but there's no reason why this information shouldn't be kept somewhere. I don't really know how any of the NOTs nominator used apply, but listcruft is also absolutely wrong, as this is a specific encyclopaedic list that likely passes
WP:GNG if sourced properly. SportingFlyer talk 21:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - transfer activity in a fully professional league such as this is likely to garner sufficient independent coverage to satisfy
WP:LISTN. Fenix down (talk) 12:05, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Lists of football transfers are frequently covered in news and other independent websites, therefore it should qualify under
WP:LISTN, however much I may dislike the proliferation of lists in Wikipedia. Hzh (talk) 15:11, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete - no evidence this is a notable topic worthy of a list. Yes, there are references that individual transfers have taken place, but these largely seem to be based on very brief reports on 90minut.pl and there is no evidence that these are being collated elsewhere and are worthy of inclusion as a list here. Eldumpo (talk) 11:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - we often keep the list of transfers that occur in professional leagues, this article should be kept. Article needs improvement not deleting. Inter&anthro (talk) 15:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sourcing is clearly popping into the article and it looks to me like it should pass
WP:GNG, I really don't like the format of the article know and feel it needs re-organising and improving. Govvy (talk) 10:53, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply
]

Keep. It is a first-tier league info and quite useful. The problem is only that out of total 46 references, 44 are cited from same website. It is like seeing a summary (in english) of that website --Fathul.mahdariza (talk) 10:29, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Fully pro league, we have for long a series of these transfers lists for many leagues FkpCascais (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2018 (UTC)every tansfer window, no reason to delete this one.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.