Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Puma sponsorships

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Daniel (talk) 22:18, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Puma sponsorships

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be largely

Iskandar323 (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

Note: This discussion has been included in the
Iskandar323 (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:36, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why are we as a non-profit doing this tracking of shoe/athletic wear sponsorships in this much detail to begin with? This isn't appropriately encyclopedic in the least and has major MOSFLAG issues (look at List of Nike sponsorships#Artists, which is so disconnected from so many policies that they're putting flag icons next to music artists). Leave this to whatever sneaker wiki tracks this stuff, it certainly doesn't fit our purposes at all (and any move to category classification isn't appropriate at all there either). Consider this an endorsement of any article in Category:Sports sponsorships to be taken to deletion. Nate • (chatter) 23:45, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no RS covering this as a list, just press releases and the like addressing individual sponsorships, so fails NLIST. AryKun (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per
WP:NOTADVERTISING. This is an encyclopedia, not the Puma marketing department, there is nothing encyclopedic about this list. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Delete: Subject clearly violates
WP:NLIST. Time to put this one to rest. Let'srun (talk) 06:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 19:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a deletion review
). No further edits should be made to this page.